July 15, 2009...4:43 pm

It’s The End Of The World As We Know It (And I Feel Fine)

Jump to Comments

ThinkAgain_creativespark

With every change there’s a backlash, and I’ve noticed there’s a new form of Ludditism creeping into a lot of the stuff I read. The posture is that the internet is making us stupid and a new generation of lazy thinkers is coming through.

Over lunch today I read a piece by University of South Florida lecturer Bob Batchelor, Google and the End of Wisdom, and his opinion is:

“Poor critical thinking in college leads to substandard thinking as adults, not the kind of skills necessary in confronting global challenges. Thus, the reliance on Google and Wikipedia for quick answers in completing a college-level paper has ramifications. We are producing a generation of lazy thinkers who gleefully use the information easily access via technology as an excuse for shoddy cognitive abilities.

“Most students are not fond of the alternative. The antithesis of simple thinking is hard work based on reading, discussion, reflection, and creating new knowledge based on the accumulation of facts, and basically critiquing one’s own thinking. Instead of putting forth such effort, which is certainly difficult, today’s students use technology as a way of outsourcing their thinking – no questions asked.

“While early Web gurus believed the Internet would democratize the world and provide a democratic platform of critical thinking about the world and oneself, today’s students use the Web to surround themselves with people, brands, and topics that are compatible to their views. As such, students follow every move of their “friends” on Facebook or Tweet back and forth with people who are just like them and have the same worldviews. They are not challenged to consider another way of looking at and being in the world – they are missing a critical exercise in compassion. “

I’ve been thinking about this a lot recently. Like a lot of people I’m having moments where the information abundance of my life is wearing a bit thin. It seems that many conversations are now playful competitions in distraction and overload. “My inbox is fuller than your inbox”.

I’ll admit that I’ve had fantasies of unplugging and perhaps taking up a new profession, like growing my own vegetables or stocking a cupboard with biros and writing my great novel in longhand.

But something rings strangely untrue about the “Google is dumbing us down” school of thought. It doesn’t describe me personally, but also it doesn’t seem to apply to anyone I know, young or old. It comes across like some kind of culture, cultivated in a laboratory, that dies as soon as it’s exposed to the real environment.

The people around me seem to be self-regulating the way they consume and use information, in a wide variety of ways. Some are in the slow lane, some are flying full-throttle down the superhighway. None of them seem to be suffering from “substandard thinking”.

I recently found the best description of my own personal relationship with information in a review by Ben Casnocha of Tyler Cowen’s book Create Your Own Economy. He says:

“I liken my information consumption patterns to eating at a churrascaria restaurant, the Brazilian style steakhouse where passadors (meat waiters) circle your table with knives and a skewer and offer fresh cuttings of filet mignon, lamb, duck, sausage, and more in unlimited quantities. The waiters know me well and recommend new cuts of meat. A hand-selected group of friends from all over the world join me at my table each night. They are outstanding conversationalists. At the churrascaria I eat, I drink, I debate, and I leave feeling not just full but deeply satisfied with the whole experience.

“The restaurant is my RSS reader (“Real Simple Syndication”) and the meat is the content flowing from my 120 subscriptions to websites or blogs. An RSS reader downloads the latest content from websites whenever they are updated and displays them in one application. The restaurant ambience, conversation, menu recommendations, and emotional satisfaction that settles in the stomach after a long meal with good friends: this is the social and interactive aspect to the Web.
In other words, my online information diet is diverse, highly personal, and comprised mostly of short bits that I consume one after another in rapid-fire fashion. And it all happens in about the same time it would take me to go through a daily newspaper.

“Self-education has gone from being like a loner sitting in a bar sparsely populated with hazily attractive women to being in the center of a packed, rocking night club where the women are wearing mini-skirts and the guys’ shirts open up several buttons down.

“Cowen refers to this process as the “daily self-assembly of synthetic experiences.” My inputs appear a chaotic jumble of scattered information but to me they touch all my interest points. When I consume them as a blend, I see all-important connections between the different intellectual narratives I follow—a business idea (entrepreneurship) in the airplane space (travel), for example. Because building the blend is a social exercise real communities and friendships form around certain topics my social life and intellectual life intersect more intensely than before. And I engage in ongoing self-discovery by reflecting upon my interests, finding new bits to add to my stream, and thinking about how it all fits together.”

It’s almost the exact opposite of the doom and gloom being theorised by thinkers like Bob Batchelor, but it rings far truer to me. Is all this multi-tasking and bit consuming making me think more or less? I can tell you unequivocally that it’s stretching my mind, intellectually and creatively, in more ways than it’s ever been stretched before.

I might be quite an extreme example, because I thrive on what Cowen calls the “autistic cognitive style” (collecting and organising information to an intense degree). But I look around at the people I know, all with their own cognitive styles and preferences, and I see that they’re all balancing their own level of focus or unfocus in their life. Their own personal blend of bits.

I don’t see people getting dumber, I see knowledge and cross-pollination of ideas exploding.

pic by creativespark: street art in Perth, Western Australia

5 Comments

  • Hi Marc,

    I enjoyed reading your take on the issue of technology and thinking skills. My article certainly meant to spark some debate.

    Your experience as a cultivated nibbler on the Web buffet does make you much different than today’s college students. So, you’re correct, you’re an “extreme example” of one kind of enlightened surfer.

    People aren’t necessarily getting dumber, but many young people do not do the deep learning of generations past that enables them to put the different bits of information together in any kind of useful manner. Most of their grazing focuses on a much narrower, celebrity-based part of the Web, mainly celeb and fashion news, film and TV stuff, and YouTube. In the US, their actual time online is primarily with friends on Facebook.

    I am not advocating a high-brow distinction between good and bad pop culture. Rather, I just wish my students would spend more time reading, thinking, and reflecting, instead of thinking up pithy FB status updates.

    Your fantasy of “unplugging” wouldn’t even register with the Millennials. They can’t help themselves. They put their cell phones on vibrate during class, but once they hear it vibrate, sit there agitated until they can see who called. There is no “off” button…ever. That can’t be a good thing.

  • Hi Bob

    Thanks so much for your comment. I loved reading your article. Different points of view are what it’s all about, and it was a great read. Certainly got me thinking.

    My mind is still not settled on this issue, and I’m still exploring it in that “autistic cognitive style” of mine. It’s like the rabbit hole in Alice… the deeper you go the stranger it gets. But more and more I wonder whether the “deep learning of the past” we’re referring to is a kind of nostalgia for a particular style of learning that we see through our generational/cultural glasses as being “better”. I know I catch myself doing that quite a lot and I read an interview with Clay Shirky recently (http://www.cjr.org/overload/interview_with_clay_shirky_par.php?page=all) that was kind of a savage wake-up call.

    I remember when I did my first degree “back in the day” how it truly felt possible to master a subject (in my case, marketing). You read Kotler, digested the theories, looked at how they connected to related disciplines like economics and saw how they operated in the real world. Now the changes fly past me so fast (crowdsourcing, social networking, herds, the long tail, the short tail, the wagging tail) that I can see why, if I was a student, I’d want to “outsource” some of that knowledge to Google.

    Steven Johnson had some interesting things to say about it 4 years ago (http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/05/16/050516crbo_books) and it was Rob Horning on the same site as your article was published who turned me on to Ben Casnocha’s review (http://www.popmatters.com/pm/post/slowing-down/).

    I certainly hear what you’re saying. Often I wish I would spend more time reading, thinking and reflecting, and not spend it updating my fb status, too. Heaven forbid I should ever get a Twitter account! I think maybe as Johnson was saying years ago, I’ve become better at fluid problem solving but at the expense of deeper contemplation. I’m really starting to think of it as a modern malaise.

    It’s a great topic. I love thinking about it and I loved your article. I really appreciate the privilege of being able to read intelligent stuff like that. And then to have correspondence… in that regard you’ve got to love the internet!

    =) best wishes
    Marc

  • so I’m undecided on this Marc. You know from my blog that I’ve certainly ranted about the “dumbing down” factor. And I recently gave up one University teaching job because I was frankly fed up with the students – after 5 years of seeing them not wish to do the hard yard of research, critical thinking etc. They just wanted the Distinction grade.
    But…..I also think that your comment is worthy of reflection – that perhaps we are yearning for a different type of learning from “long ago”. We learn differently now because their is a whole different buffet out there.We can assemble as we like; nibble on this and that; change our knowledge flows by booting someone off our RSS feeds and so on.
    I’ve recently joined Twitter (after much reluctance and cynicism) but I’ve had more of my questions answered by Twitterers than I would probably have had via my personal networks. “Strangers” who follow me, with a different POV and mental models, answer the question and so I am connected to a whole heap of people I never would have been before and can surely engage with and learn from etc.
    I’m still undecided! I’ll check out the links you provided. Kim

  • [...] added to my thoughts a little about the backlash I was writing about a while ago from educators who feel that the internet is promoting poor critical thinking. Could [...]

  • [...] the article. My blogging colleague Marc over at Creative Spark (you have to read his blog) had an interesting exchange with Bob regarding his article, so I won’t rehash the issues [...]


Leave a Reply